Conflictological Approach to the Actual Typology of Political Regimes
Abstract
The verticalization of political relations has strengthened the process of losing by classical political science terms their institutional and functional designation. The article is devoted to the consideration of the role of the state in the arrangement of conflicts under different political regimes. The author attempts to expose the identification features of political regimes through the prism of a conflict approach, where conflicts are a source of violation of the social order created by the government. The author shows in details a multi-layered conflict in the modern society, determined by the imitation of democratic institutions under the authoritarian model of political management. This leads to marginalization of management practices and procedures for eliminating systemic conflicts and postponing the principal decisions to correct the conflictual reality.
Keywords:
conflict, democratization, political regime, state, civil society, political parties, monocentrism, opposition, centralization
References
Aleinikov A.V. 2014a. Razlomy i treshchiny: konfliktologicheskii dizain sovremennoi Rossii. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 6. Politologiya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. № 4. S. 83-93. (RUS.)
Aleinikov A.V. 2014b. Konfliktnaya model' Rossii: «Proshloe zavtrashnego nastoyashchego». – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 17. Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kul'turologiya. Religiovedenie. № 1. S. 43-54. (RUS.)
Aleinikov A.V., Pinkevich A.G. 2015. Konfliktnaya spetsifika gibridnykh politicheskikh rezhimov: rossiiskii sluchai. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 17. Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kul'turologiya. Religiovedenie. № 3. S. 85-95. (RUS.)
Anashvili V.V. 2009. Demokratiya v sovremennom mire. Sluchai Rossii. – Otsenka sostoyaniya i perspektiv politicheskoi sistemy Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2008 – nachale 2009 goda. Pervyi ezhegodnyi doklad Instituta obshchestvennogo proektirovaniya. M.
Bauman Z. 2002. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo. M.: Logos. 390 s. (RUS.)
Grigor'ev L.M., Salmina A.A. 2013. «Struktura» sotsial'nogo neravenstva sovremennogo mira: problemy izmereniya. – Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. № 3. S. 5-21. (RUS.)
Dorozhkin Yu.N. 2016. Politicheskaya sistema sovremennoi Rossii: demokratiya ili avtoritarizm? – Vlast'. № 8. S. 14-18. (RUS.)
Zudin A.Yu. Politicheskii monotsentrizm v Rossii: ot rezhima k sisteme. – Puti Rossii: sushchestvuyushchie ogranicheniya i vozmozhnye varianty: sbornik (pod red. T.E. Vorozheikina). 2004. M.: Moskovskaya vysshaya shkola sots. i ekon. nauk. S. 86-96. (RUS.)
Il'in V.V., Panarin A.S., Akhiezer A.S. 1996. Teoreticheskaya politologiya: Reformy i kontrreformy v Rossii. Tsikly modernizatsionnogo protsessa. M.: Izd-vo MGU. 400 s. (RUS.)
Korolev P.A. 2016. Ambifaktornaya metodika analiza demokraticheskogo tranzita na postsotsialisticheskom prostranstve (chast' I). – Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki. № 3. S. 22-31. (RUS.)
Kostyleva L.V. 2011. Neravenstvo naseleniya Rossii: tendentsii, faktory, regulirovanie. Vologda: Institut sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya territorii RAN. 223 s. (RUS.)
Meleshkin I.G. 2008. Ideologicheskii faktor v sovremennoi rossiiskoi partiinoi sisteme. – Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. Ser. Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki. № 49. S. 128-129. (RUS.)
O'Donnell G. 1994. Delegativnaya demokratiya. – Predely vlasti. № 2-3. S. 52-69. (RUS.)
Trofimov E.A. 2014. Subinstitutsionalizatsiya politicheskikh partii v Rossii. – Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. № 19. S. 108-110. (RUS.)
Turen A. 1998. Vozvrashchenie cheloveka deistvuyushchego. Ocherk sotsiologii. M.: Nauchnyi mir. 206 s. (RUS.)
Tyan V.V. 2016. Osobennosti evolyutsii politicheskogo rezhima v paradigme sistemnogo krizisa i stranovoi identifikatsii (kontseptivno-paradigmal'nyi podkhod). – Vlast'. № 2. S. 57-63. (RUS.)
Khazov A.M. 2012. Kharakteristika politicheskikh rezhimov v postsovetskoi Rossii. – Vlast'. № 2. S. 109-112. (RUS.)
Kholodkovskii K. 2009. K voprosu o politicheskoi sisteme sovremennoi Rossii. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 2. S. 7-22. (RUS.)
Shevtsova L. 1999. Rezhim Borisa El'tsina. M.: Moskovskii Tsentr Karnegi. 511 s. (RUS.)
Shitova E.N. 2014. «Demokratii s prilagatel'nymi» v politologicheskom diskurse. – Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. № 3. S. 98-103. (RUS.)
Shkaratan O. 2011. Rossiiskaya «psevdoelita» i ee identifikatsiya v mirovom kontekste. – Mir Rossii. № 4. S. 68-88. (RUS.)
Shkel' S.N. 2013. Novaya volna: mnogoobrazie avtoritarizma v otrazhenii sovremennoi politicheskoi nauki. – PolitBook. № 4. S. 120-139. (RUS.)
Shlyapentokh V. 2008. Sovremennaya Rossiya kak feodal'noe obshchestvo. Novyi rakurs postsovetskoi ery. M.: Stolitsa-Print. 328 s. (RUS.)
Yanitskii O.N. 2013. Sotsial'nye dvizheniya: teoriya, praktika, perspektiva. M.: Novyi khronograf. 360 s. (RUS.)
Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. 2005. Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. – Handbook of Economic Growth. Vol. 1A. P. 385-472.
Bogaards M. 2009. How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism. – Democratization. No. 2. P. 399-423.
Collier D., Levitsky S. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. – World Politics. No. 49 (April). P. 430-451.
Croissanta A. 2004. From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping Asian Democratization. – Democratization. Vol. 11. No. 5. P. 156-158.
Diamond L. 2002. Thinking about Hybrid Regimes. – Journal of Democracy. № 2. P. 21-35.
Freedom in the World 2001. URL: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2001 (accessed 24.02.2017).
Freedom in the World 2013. URL: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2013 (accessed 24.02.2017).
Gerschewski J. 2013. The Three Pillars of stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Cooptation in Autocratic Regimes. – Democratization. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 18-25.
International Actors, Democratization and the Rule of Law: Anchoring Democracy? (ed. by A. Magen, L. Morlino). 2009. N.Y.: Routledge. 292 p.
Merkel W. 2004. Embedded and defective democracies. – Democratization. Vol. 11. No. 5. P. 33-58.
Munck G., Verkuilen J. 2002. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. – Comparative Political Studies. No. 1. P. 5-34.
Petrov N., Lipman M., Hale H.E. 2010. Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications of Hybrid Regimes. – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Paper № 106.
Puhle H. 2005. Democratic Consolidation and «Defective Democracies». – Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. Working Paper. No. 47. P.1-20.
Sukov V. 2009. Nationalization of the Future: Paragraphs pro Sovereign Democracy. – Russian Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 47. No. 4. P. 8-21.
Aleinikov A.V. 2014b. Konfliktnaya model' Rossii: «Proshloe zavtrashnego nastoyashchego». – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 17. Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kul'turologiya. Religiovedenie. № 1. S. 43-54. (RUS.)
Aleinikov A.V., Pinkevich A.G. 2015. Konfliktnaya spetsifika gibridnykh politicheskikh rezhimov: rossiiskii sluchai. – Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 17. Filosofiya. Konfliktologiya. Kul'turologiya. Religiovedenie. № 3. S. 85-95. (RUS.)
Anashvili V.V. 2009. Demokratiya v sovremennom mire. Sluchai Rossii. – Otsenka sostoyaniya i perspektiv politicheskoi sistemy Rossiiskoi Federatsii v 2008 – nachale 2009 goda. Pervyi ezhegodnyi doklad Instituta obshchestvennogo proektirovaniya. M.
Bauman Z. 2002. Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo. M.: Logos. 390 s. (RUS.)
Grigor'ev L.M., Salmina A.A. 2013. «Struktura» sotsial'nogo neravenstva sovremennogo mira: problemy izmereniya. – Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. № 3. S. 5-21. (RUS.)
Dorozhkin Yu.N. 2016. Politicheskaya sistema sovremennoi Rossii: demokratiya ili avtoritarizm? – Vlast'. № 8. S. 14-18. (RUS.)
Zudin A.Yu. Politicheskii monotsentrizm v Rossii: ot rezhima k sisteme. – Puti Rossii: sushchestvuyushchie ogranicheniya i vozmozhnye varianty: sbornik (pod red. T.E. Vorozheikina). 2004. M.: Moskovskaya vysshaya shkola sots. i ekon. nauk. S. 86-96. (RUS.)
Il'in V.V., Panarin A.S., Akhiezer A.S. 1996. Teoreticheskaya politologiya: Reformy i kontrreformy v Rossii. Tsikly modernizatsionnogo protsessa. M.: Izd-vo MGU. 400 s. (RUS.)
Korolev P.A. 2016. Ambifaktornaya metodika analiza demokraticheskogo tranzita na postsotsialisticheskom prostranstve (chast' I). – Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Gumanitarnye nauki. № 3. S. 22-31. (RUS.)
Kostyleva L.V. 2011. Neravenstvo naseleniya Rossii: tendentsii, faktory, regulirovanie. Vologda: Institut sotsial'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya territorii RAN. 223 s. (RUS.)
Meleshkin I.G. 2008. Ideologicheskii faktor v sovremennoi rossiiskoi partiinoi sisteme. – Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. A.I. Gertsena. Ser. Obshchestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki. № 49. S. 128-129. (RUS.)
O'Donnell G. 1994. Delegativnaya demokratiya. – Predely vlasti. № 2-3. S. 52-69. (RUS.)
Trofimov E.A. 2014. Subinstitutsionalizatsiya politicheskikh partii v Rossii. – Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. № 19. S. 108-110. (RUS.)
Turen A. 1998. Vozvrashchenie cheloveka deistvuyushchego. Ocherk sotsiologii. M.: Nauchnyi mir. 206 s. (RUS.)
Tyan V.V. 2016. Osobennosti evolyutsii politicheskogo rezhima v paradigme sistemnogo krizisa i stranovoi identifikatsii (kontseptivno-paradigmal'nyi podkhod). – Vlast'. № 2. S. 57-63. (RUS.)
Khazov A.M. 2012. Kharakteristika politicheskikh rezhimov v postsovetskoi Rossii. – Vlast'. № 2. S. 109-112. (RUS.)
Kholodkovskii K. 2009. K voprosu o politicheskoi sisteme sovremennoi Rossii. – Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. № 2. S. 7-22. (RUS.)
Shevtsova L. 1999. Rezhim Borisa El'tsina. M.: Moskovskii Tsentr Karnegi. 511 s. (RUS.)
Shitova E.N. 2014. «Demokratii s prilagatel'nymi» v politologicheskom diskurse. – Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. № 3. S. 98-103. (RUS.)
Shkaratan O. 2011. Rossiiskaya «psevdoelita» i ee identifikatsiya v mirovom kontekste. – Mir Rossii. № 4. S. 68-88. (RUS.)
Shkel' S.N. 2013. Novaya volna: mnogoobrazie avtoritarizma v otrazhenii sovremennoi politicheskoi nauki. – PolitBook. № 4. S. 120-139. (RUS.)
Shlyapentokh V. 2008. Sovremennaya Rossiya kak feodal'noe obshchestvo. Novyi rakurs postsovetskoi ery. M.: Stolitsa-Print. 328 s. (RUS.)
Yanitskii O.N. 2013. Sotsial'nye dvizheniya: teoriya, praktika, perspektiva. M.: Novyi khronograf. 360 s. (RUS.)
Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. 2005. Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth. – Handbook of Economic Growth. Vol. 1A. P. 385-472.
Bogaards M. 2009. How to Classify Hybrid Regimes? Defective Democracy and Electoral Authoritarianism. – Democratization. No. 2. P. 399-423.
Collier D., Levitsky S. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. – World Politics. No. 49 (April). P. 430-451.
Croissanta A. 2004. From Transition to Defective Democracy: Mapping Asian Democratization. – Democratization. Vol. 11. No. 5. P. 156-158.
Diamond L. 2002. Thinking about Hybrid Regimes. – Journal of Democracy. № 2. P. 21-35.
Freedom in the World 2001. URL: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2001 (accessed 24.02.2017).
Freedom in the World 2013. URL: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/freedom-world-2013 (accessed 24.02.2017).
Gerschewski J. 2013. The Three Pillars of stability: Legitimation, Repression, and Cooptation in Autocratic Regimes. – Democratization. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 18-25.
International Actors, Democratization and the Rule of Law: Anchoring Democracy? (ed. by A. Magen, L. Morlino). 2009. N.Y.: Routledge. 292 p.
Merkel W. 2004. Embedded and defective democracies. – Democratization. Vol. 11. No. 5. P. 33-58.
Munck G., Verkuilen J. 2002. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. – Comparative Political Studies. No. 1. P. 5-34.
Petrov N., Lipman M., Hale H.E. 2010. Overmanaged Democracy in Russia: Governance Implications of Hybrid Regimes. – Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Paper № 106.
Puhle H. 2005. Democratic Consolidation and «Defective Democracies». – Universidad Autonoma de Madrid. Working Paper. No. 47. P.1-20.
Sukov V. 2009. Nationalization of the Future: Paragraphs pro Sovereign Democracy. – Russian Studies in Philosophy. Vol. 47. No. 4. P. 8-21.
Issue
Section
POLITICAL SCIENCE
Following the submission of the manuscript to the Publisher, the author binds oneself not to publish it somewhere else without permission of the Publisher.
